Quoting%20commentary for Yevamot 225:17

ואיכא דאמרי אמר רב חייא בר אשי אמר שמואל אשת חרש חייבין עליה אשם תלוי מיתיבי חמשה לא יתרומו סבר לה כרבי אלעזר

an <i>asham talui</i> also should be incurred!<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' In a case of intercourse with his wife. Cf. supra p. 795, n. 15, mutatis mutandis. ');">⁴⁵</span> — It is necessary<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' If an asham talui is to be incurred. ');">⁴⁶</span> [that the offence should be similar to that of eating] one of two available pieces [of meat].<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' One of which was definitely forbidden and the other definitely permitted, and it is unknown whether a person ate the one or the other. Only in such a case, where the doubt is due to the existence of two objects, is an asham talui incurred. Similarly in the case of intercourse with one of two women, when it is unknown whether the woman affected was his own wife or a forbidden stranger, an asham talui is incurred. If the doubt, however, relates to one object, it being unknown, for instance, whether a piece of fat one has eaten was of the permitted or forbidden kind, no asham talui is involved. Similarly, in the case of the deaf man's marriage, where the doubt relates to one woman, it being uncertain whether she has the status of a married woman or not, no asham talui is incurred. ');">⁴⁷</span>

Explore quoting%20commentary for Yevamot 225:17. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.